http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/ Let me understand myself Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:57:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-380 Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:19:48 +0000 http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-380 Welcome back, Karthik :) after winter sleep.. Welcome back, Karthik after winter sleep..

]]> http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-379 Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:55:02 +0000 http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-379 True. This can be a warning. There was another regulation about preventing companies that receive Federal bailout dollars from replacing their employees with H1 contractors. If bills like those are approved, then this may become a serious issue. Thanks for vising my blog and commenting. True. This can be a warning. There was another regulation about preventing companies that receive Federal bailout dollars from replacing their employees with H1 contractors. If bills like those are approved, then this may become a serious issue.
Thanks for vising my blog and commenting.

]]> http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-378 Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:42:26 +0000 http://rkarthik.blogsome.com/2009/02/26/p222/#comment-378 The analysis is absolutely correct. Outsourcing does not lead to profit abroad and hence does not come under tax break under Tax Code. However, what President Obama may imply is that any global US company generating profits from its subsidiaries abroad will lose the tax break if it does any kind of outsourcing of any magnitude, even if its outsourcing is not related to the activities of its subsidiaries. It is like disqualifying an athlete found guilty of taking drugs. The analysis is absolutely correct. Outsourcing does not lead to profit abroad and hence does not come under tax break under Tax Code. However, what President Obama may imply is that any global US company generating profits from its subsidiaries abroad will lose the tax break if it does any kind of outsourcing of any magnitude, even if its outsourcing is not related to the activities of its subsidiaries. It is like disqualifying an athlete found guilty of taking drugs.

]]>